I wasn't given adequate information

“I am a mum to three beautiful boys who I believe have been injured by vaccination. I still can't believe that at no point during the vaccination process was I provided with information about what was in the injections, or any risks / adverse effects associated with the needles. 

Two of my boys are anaphylactic to nuts, also suffering with Asthma. One of these two presents with traits of ASD whilst also displaying tics. 

Although I didn't notice any side effects at the time (other than them being unhappy / unsettled), I know I always prayed they would be ok and dreaded waiting that 15 minutes or so afterwards. I worried immensely watching them be so out-of-sorts immediately following the injections. 

I attended the community sessions for the immunisations, so I can't say I felt pressured. What I can say is that I wasn't given adequate information in order for me to form an opinion / view as to whether the benefits outweighed the risks. There was never a discussion of ingredients, I mean, aborted fetal cells - how could they not disclose that information?

Medical advice has always been that these issues are not linked to their immunisations. I have since spent time doing my own research and have been completely bewildered upon understanding what is in these injections. Upon reviewing their childhood immunisations they are stamped "consent given" or something similar. 

In doing what I thought was right (what the doctor told me to), I realise I was never provided with an opportunity for informed consent. This is what has to change. If I knew what I know now, I would never have allowed my boys to be vaccinated. The industry needs to come clean.

I recommend anyone who is choosing to vaccinate now; ask lots of questions. And if it doesn't feel right - don't do it.”

---