Open Letter To the WA AMA President - Dr. Andrew Miller

Please can you explain to the Western Australian community why the AMA is claiming that there has been a 'global pandemic' of a new coronavirus when  there is no science to support this statement? 
Please listen to these doctors all over the world state there is ‘no true medical pandemic ’.
The many flaws in the WHO 'pandemic' claim have been exposed and I am wondering why the AMA is still promoting this agenda in WA that continues to remove human rights from West Australians without any scientific basis. In fact, WA is the only state that has made it a criminal offence to refuse a medical directive. Why?
The flaws in the claim of a 'global pandemic' include:
1) The WHO's original claim in March 2020 was based solely on a mathematical model that used flawed assumptions about virus transmission. This is not science. This model wildly exaggerated the deaths/cases and was dumped by the US Surgeon-General, Jerome Adams, on 13 April because it was "not based on real data".
2) Locking down countries and closing borders is not the traditional evidence-based method of controlling any infectious agent due to the way in which they cause disease. The WHO admitted this fact on 12 October 2020.
3) The only way to get 'real data' in order to declare a 'global pandemic', is to experience the virus in the country and use the traditional methods of isolating and quarantining the sick people first to see how this virus is transmitting in different countries and host populations. This was never done to prove that the virus would have been a 'pandemic' in Australia. No real data has been collected in Australia and now it is clearly showing it is not a true medical pandemic.
4) Closing borders as a 'precautionary measure' before a virus is in the country is not a scientific method and has never been used to control any infectious agent.   
5) The ‘cases’ of this disease published in the media were people without symptoms that were used by the mainstream media to frighten the public about a ‘pandemic’. The ‘cases’ were based on a positive RT-PCR test that cannot diagnose infections (the whole natural virus) in people. The test is a useless test for diagnosis, and even if it could accurately detect a whole viral genome, (which it can’t), it has a very high false-positive rate (>40%) for detecting segments of the genome. 
This means that healthy people are being quarantined based on a PCR test that does not identify the presence of the virus. It should also be noted that even if a virus is present in a healthy person, it may never cause disease. It may remain sub-clinical due to the multifactorial nature of disease expression from infectious agents. This is described in my recently published paper on the misuse of the precautionary principle by governments in the promotion of vaccines.
Portugal has recently stated in a court ruling that ‘The PCR test is unreliable and quarantines unlawful’.
The new COVID19 vaccine is experimental and unproven for safety or efficacy. It includes synthetic (recombinant) Coronavirus 2019 (SARSCov-2) and other new technology. Here are the global doctors saying there is no true pandemic and they are being censored by the media: The Question on Everyone’s Mind: Experts Discuss COVID19 Vaccine.
As you know vaccine manufacturers are not worried about the safety of vaccines because they are indemnified for any harm caused by vaccines. This includes the safety of COVID19 vaccines, including the AstraZeneca vaccine.
I would like the Australian Medical Association and the Western Australian Health Minister, Roger Cook, to address this information and explain in your response why:
i) You are claiming there is a 'pandemic' of a coronavirus and
ii) Why you are pushing for an unproven experimental COVID19 vaccine onto the population for a disease that 99.9% of people recover from and 99.6% of people over the age of 65 recover from? 
Experimenting on the population is a breach of the Nuremberg Code and will result in a charge of genocide and crimes against humanity for perpetrators under the International Criminal Code Statute that Australia has ratified. This action against governments has already started in the international criminal courts. 
Please include in your response to these points why you do not think that coercive vaccination policies - with any vaccine - classifies as genocide and a crime against the population, under Article 6 and 7 of the International Criminal Code Statute, when all vaccines carry the risk of serious disease and death for many people? 
I have copied Travis Carter and Dwain Hill into this email and I look forward to hearing your response on radio 897 FM soon. This is an open letter that I will publish on my website.
Kind regards,
Dr. Judy Wilyman 
Recently published paper by Dr. Judy Wilyman - ‘Misapplication of the Precautionary Principle has Misplaced the Burden of Proof of Vaccine Safety