What freedoms are we at risk of losing if we refuse the vaccine?

​In case you had any doubts about the Government’s plans to ensure high uptake of the Covid 19 vaccination, this article published on August 19 outlines how those refusing the Covid 19 vaccine will be banned from travelling overseas, dining in restaurants and using public transport, and government financial support could be curtailed or refused. Today, this new article is beginning to drive home the narrative, there is quite a pattern forming. The intent is clearly to coerce 95% of the population into taking the vaccine.
​
These measures will strike all classes within society, but the measures that remove one’s ability to provide for life itself will affect the most vulnerable people - those who depend on government benefits to live. For many not on government support, the ability to earn a living will be severely impacted. Are you a student, just getting by with a part-time job as a waiter? Or someone for whom travel is an integral part of your job? Your right to exercise choice of medical freedom means you may lose your job, and in effect, your source of income. Furthermore, the Government has previously flagged that all frontline workers, i.e., people who come in contact with the public as part of their job, will be the first to be vaccinated. This will affect the entire Service industry, the Health industry, and the Education sector.

For the few who are not impacted financially, quality of life will be drastically reduced. Do you like to take annual trips overseas and dine-out in restaurants? You can kiss those pleasures goodbye. For some families split across countries, it will be an impossible decision. You have to weigh up the risks of the vaccine with the decision of ever seeing overseas loved ones again. Do you rely on or prefer to use buses and trains? No longer an option. Think of all of the families that have no car, or only one car, that rely on public transport to move around: mums with children, inner city dwellers, pensioners, and adult students.

Our quality of life has already been significantly impacted, with the new tracking measures and regulations that mean simply walking into any restaurant, public building, church, both now and in the future involves disclosing personal details. It is inevitable, that to consolidate all of the regulations and simplify the whole surveillance process, a “health passport” of some sort will be introduced. This was also flagged in the Daily Mirror article. There is no doubt that these measures will create a culture of “insiders” and “outsiders” where those who receive the vaccine will have both obvious and subtle advantages over those who don’t. Those who choose not to have the vaccine won’t be allowed to join the work team for Christmas lunch in the restaurant. Your kids can’t take the bus to school. These measures will work together to create an overall loss of freedom to conduct your life the way you choose.

According to Scott Morrison, such measures are warranted for a “...pandemic that has destroyed the global economy and taken the lives of hundreds of thousands all around the world.” This statement is currently under fierce dispute, with many statisticians, epidemiologists and economists around the world saying otherwise. To address the claim of hundreds of thousands of deaths, it is now well known that these have been grossly over-reported. In March 2020, the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “…decided to ignore universal data collection and reporting guidelines for fatalities in favour of adopting new guidelines unique to COVID-19. The guidelines the CDC decided against using have been used successfully since 2003.”

The simple fact of the matter is that the disease is significantly less infectious than previously thought: for example, UK public health bodies deemed that it is no longer considered to be a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) in June 2020. Not that you could tell this from the reports in main-stream media. Furthermore, a study of infection fatality rate (IFR) released in June 2020 has indicated that, while variable across the world, the chance of surviving Covid 19 for a healthy person less than 70 years of age with no comorbidities is 99.95% for women and 99.88% for men. This survival rate is even higher with decreasing age. Similar results have been reported in this WHO study, showing that in Australia “…overall mortality is in the range of a mild influenza season.”
 
As for destroying the global economy, it is the decisions of the governments around the world that have caused this. Focussing on Victoria: we had a sound pandemic plan in March 2020, in which two key principles were that the response be “flexible and proportionate” and that it be “focused on protecting vulnerable Victorians”. Lockdowns were absolutely not part of this pandemic plan, which had been designed based on the most up-to-date science and the experience from previous pandemics. By end of March, the Victorian Government stopped following the plan and moved to a lockdown. By doing this, they switched the focus and resources from protecting the 1% vulnerable Victorians to locking down and controlling the 99% of Victorians who would have never been adversely affected by the virus. Governments all over the world followed suit, resulting in the near destruction of the global economy.
The virus did not create this situation, the actions of the governments did. Does Scott Morrison think we will accept his sweeping statement, now that so much real data to the contrary is available?

The reason the Government is planning to coerce us into taking this vaccine, is because many of us are justifiably worried about it and have said are opposed to taking it. We have previously written about the risks in this article. Essentially, we are talking about gene altering technology which ethicists and life scientists have been warning about for decades, messing with our immune system of all things. Auto immune diseases are on the rise in western countries and are not properly understood. How do we know that this rushed to market vaccine will not detrimentally impact the way our bodies will fight other diseases and viruses?  Also, what happens when another vaccine is injected on top of this – are we expected to have another mRNA vaccine in the future for something else? If so, how many viruses are we supposed to carry in our cells “just in case”, and where are the studies showing that this is safe and effective in both the long and short term? Scott Morrison waves off concerns with statements like the vaccine “will be fully tested” and at the same time has exempted all of the Australian vaccine manufacturers from liability for injuries relating to these rushed to market products, and in the case of AstraZeneca, from providing the usual requirement of safety data for 6 years after the initial doses are administered in 2021.

There is talk about “valid” medical exemptions but the list is extremely limited. There are thousands of stories here on VCA and on other networks, about how lives have been destroyed through vaccine injury.

The Australian government under Scott Morrison is attacking one of our most precious freedoms; that of control over our own bodies. He knows it is unlawful to mandate vaccinations but seeks to achieve a pseudo mandate with these proposed new measures.  These are not trivial measures; they are draconian in their reach and their impact. All to supposedly “protect” us, when not one vaccine can ever deliver the results against Covid 19 that a healthy immune system can.  One cannot help wondering what the purpose of the vaccine really is.

Where there is risk, there must ALWAYS be choice - free from coercion with complete informed consent.
 

---