You Will No Longer Be Fully Vaccinated with Two Shots

Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has hinted that those who don’t receive booster shots will not be considered fully vaccinated moving forward.
 
Mr Andrews suggested that it would be about the “maintenance of your vaccination status” in order to maintain your ‘freedoms’.
 
“I hope, and we’ll play our part in this, like a month before your six months is up, then you will get a message and your vaccination certificate, the thing that gets you the green tick, you’ll be prompted to go and book a time to go and have your booster shot.”
 
Does this mean that people will need to receive a booster shot every six months?
 
And more importantly, where is the evidence to support such a program?
 
Israel was one of the first countries in the world to roll out booster shots. In order for someone to maintain their vaccine passport, or Green Pass, they are now required to have a booster shot. For the million or more people who haven’t yet had their third dose, they are now restricted from participating normally within society.
 
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently announced that the CDC “may need to update our definition of ‘fully vaccinated’ in the future” to only include those who have had three doses of the vaccine.
 
Deputy Chief Medical Officer Michael Kidd explained that “antibody levels fall over time and there is a risk of breakthrough infections where vaccinated people may become infected and at risk of transmitting COVID-19 to others. So, a booster dose, if you like, turbocharges your immune response and provides additional layers of protection to you and to your loved ones, and to the wider community.”
 
The current research shows that immunity wanes relatively quickly.
 
A study conducted in Qatar and published in the New England Journal of Medicine concluded that “BNT162b2-induced protection against SARS-COV-2 infection appeared to wane rapidly following its peak after the second dose”.
 
“Estimated BNT162b2 effectiveness against any SARS-CoV-2 infection was negligible in the first 2 weeks after the first dose. It increased to 36.8%... in the third week after the first dose and reached its peak at 77.5%... in the first month after the second dose.”
 
“Effectiveness declined gradually thereafter, with the decline accelerating after the fourth month to reach approximately 20% in months 5 through 7 after the second dose. Effectiveness against symptomatic infection was higher than effectiveness against asymptomatic infection but waned similarly. Variant-specific effectiveness waned in the same pattern.”
 
Another study from Israel, also published in the New England Journal of Medicine, stated that “BNT162b2-induced protection against SARS-COV-2 infection appeared to wane rapidly following its peak after the second dose, but protection against hospitalisation and death persisted at a robust level for 6 months after the second dose”.
 
The most damning study of all is a preprint study that was just released, which concluded that “these data demonstrate a substantial waning of antibody responses and T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, at 6 months following the second immunisation with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Notably, a significant proportion of vaccinees have neutralising titres below the detection limit.”
 
After six months, antibodies were no longer detectable.
 
The booster shot is not different to the initial shot, meaning that protection will mostly wane at a similar rate. Is this why Mr Andrews has suggested a booster shot every six months?
 
The vaccine was also developed for the wild-type virus, such as the Alpha, Beta and Gamma variants. The Delta variant is now the predominant strain, and the virus may continue to mutate. Will this render the vaccine completely ineffective, regardless of booster shots?
 
What’s more concerning is that the Federal government has “secured an additional 85 million doses of Pfizer, which brings Australia’s total Pfizer doses to 125 million”. This is enough to vaccinate the entire population five times over, and it doesn’t even include doses of AstraZeneca or Moderna.
 
What has the government got planned? What are they not telling us?
 
As we know, the long-term safety of the vaccine is unknown. There has already been an enormous amount of death and disability following the roll out of the vaccine.
 
In the US, there have been 818,044 adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, including 117,399 serious injuries and 17,128 deaths. There have been more deaths in ten months from this one vaccine than from all other vaccines in the past 30 years.
 
In Australia, there has been 72,011 adverse events reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, including 612 deaths reported shortly after receiving the vaccine. Nine of these deaths have been officially linked to the vaccine.
 
There has been 312 reports of suspected myocarditis, 836 reports of suspected pericarditis, 156 cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS), 131 reports of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), and 85 reports of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). All of these conditions are serious and could have devastating long-term ramifications.
 
What’s worse is that there is a maniacal push to vaccinate every man, woman and child. Why?
 
We need to slow down, not speed up. We need to take a step back. We are seeing a rise in cases, which will increase the chance of severe illness and death, in some of the most highly vaccinated countries.
 
Why is there such a cult-like mentality around vaccination? Why have the government purchased so many doses of the vaccine? And what is the government hiding from its citizens?
 
Many people were coerced into taking the vaccine in the first place. Will they be coerced into taking booster shots? Will those who choose not to take a booster shot be locked out of society with the unvaccinated?
 
It’s time to question the motives of those pushing vaccines on the entire population.
 
Where will it end? And at what cost?

---