|
We have partnered with My Say to be able to bring our community the incredible platform to send letters easily to your MPs. Each campaign costs money to run. My Say and Vaccine Choice Australia (including the Stand Up Australia Tour) are able to bring you the latest information and access to campaigns through your generous donations. If you would like to contribute to My Say or Vaccine Choice Australia you can do so any time by clicking the donate button.
|
TRUTH DAY LETTERS TO YOUR ELECTED members
Here is where you will find the latest Truth Day question announced each Tuesday. This is where you get to ask your MPs about this question and let them know how you feel about it. Remember that they can't represent you properly if you're not communicating how you feel on issues. Simply complete the details in the form below and don't forget to check the link in your email to confirm and send. You may also need to check your junk folder for the confirmation. A couple of pointers:
Channel 9 has rolled out an advertising campaign with well-known media personalities to encourage Australians to get their “shot”. The campaign starts with Scott Cam saying that “now we have a shot to get lives back to normal”.
Those in the advertisement claim that this is our “shot” to “protect our community”, “keep our borders open”, “explore the world again”, “keep live music alive”, “keep businesses open”, “keep people in jobs”, “keep healthy and safe”, “bring Australians home”, “get everyone together for Christmas”, and “help save lives”.
The “shot” does not provide immunity or prevent transmission. The clinical trials did not show statistical significance in terms of reducing severe illness, hospitalisation and death. There are no long-term safety studies, and the data is limited on those with comorbidities, pregnancy and breast feeding. There have been severe adverse events and death following the "Shot'.
How much have these media personalities been paid for the advertising campaign, and were they paid to take part in it? Was it part of their contractual agreement? Is their contractual agreement available to the Australian people and you as an elected representative?
Are those involved aware of the TGA’s Australian Public Assessment Reports for the Pfizer and AstraZeneca 'shot', as well as the significant risk factors associated with the 'shot'?
Have they been granted indemnity by the Australian government for deceiving and misleading the Australian public, and will they be held responsible should someone suffer from an adverse event or die as a result of taking the 'shot' as a consequence of their representations? Did these personalities undergo a training program to prepare them to make such representations that included an understanding of the risks to the public from following their representations and indeed to their own brands as celebrities?
Why are Channel 9 media personalities promoting the vaccine with no medical background or expertise, and coercing Australians into taking the vaccine so that they can get their “lives back to normal”. Is this really true since the 'shot' does not protect anyone from transmission?
- Use your own words as much as possible.
- You do NOT need to use a greeting or sign off - this is all done for you
- Review your letter. The last box will show you exactly how your email will look. Edit this section to make sure you are happy with how it reads before you press submit.
- Check your email for the confirmation email for your letter to be sent. Check your junk folder.
Channel 9 has rolled out an advertising campaign with well-known media personalities to encourage Australians to get their “shot”. The campaign starts with Scott Cam saying that “now we have a shot to get lives back to normal”.
Those in the advertisement claim that this is our “shot” to “protect our community”, “keep our borders open”, “explore the world again”, “keep live music alive”, “keep businesses open”, “keep people in jobs”, “keep healthy and safe”, “bring Australians home”, “get everyone together for Christmas”, and “help save lives”.
The “shot” does not provide immunity or prevent transmission. The clinical trials did not show statistical significance in terms of reducing severe illness, hospitalisation and death. There are no long-term safety studies, and the data is limited on those with comorbidities, pregnancy and breast feeding. There have been severe adverse events and death following the "Shot'.
How much have these media personalities been paid for the advertising campaign, and were they paid to take part in it? Was it part of their contractual agreement? Is their contractual agreement available to the Australian people and you as an elected representative?
Are those involved aware of the TGA’s Australian Public Assessment Reports for the Pfizer and AstraZeneca 'shot', as well as the significant risk factors associated with the 'shot'?
Have they been granted indemnity by the Australian government for deceiving and misleading the Australian public, and will they be held responsible should someone suffer from an adverse event or die as a result of taking the 'shot' as a consequence of their representations? Did these personalities undergo a training program to prepare them to make such representations that included an understanding of the risks to the public from following their representations and indeed to their own brands as celebrities?
Why are Channel 9 media personalities promoting the vaccine with no medical background or expertise, and coercing Australians into taking the vaccine so that they can get their “lives back to normal”. Is this really true since the 'shot' does not protect anyone from transmission?
