Vaccine Choice Australia
  • Home
  • TRUTH DAY
  • Current MP Letters
  • Rebuttal and News
  • RESOURCES
  • CONNECT
  • Write to your MPs
  • Stand Up Australia

If it’s beneficial, why incentivise it?

6/2/2021

13 Comments

 
Picture
​Qantas CEO Alan Joyce has announced that Qantas will launch an incentives program from July to encourage people to get vaccinated. The program will also include anyone who has already received the vaccine.
 
In a recent interview, Mr Joyce said that “we are looking at giving 1000 points flight vouchers, credits and we are going to offer ten mega prizes, at least one for each state and territory, where a family of four get unlimited travel on the Qantas and Jetstar network, anywhere in the network for a year”.
 
“We are trying our best to help with this vaccine rollout – it will be retrospective and will include anyone who has already been vaccinated and will apply to anybody that is vaccinated until the end of 2021.”
 
This announcement comes after Mr Joyce’s comments in late 2020 that “future international travel will require compulsory vaccinations”, and that Qantas will be “changing terms and conditions for travel”.
 
It seems that Qantas isn’t the only company incentivising the experimental injection. In the US, New Jersey was offering a “shot and a beer” for those who received their first dose in May, whilst Detroit is giving out “$50 prepaid cards” to anyone who drives a resident to a vaccine site. Meanwhile in Maryland, state employees are being offered a “$100 payment” for being vaccinated.
 
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts is offering a free doughnut a day for the rest of the year with proof of vaccination. Which is ironic given that people with comorbidities such as obesity are at far greater risk of dying from COVID-19 than those who are healthy.
 
In Cleveland, Chagrin Cinemas were offering free popcorn, whilst Market Garden Brewery were offering 10-cent beers. In gets worse. In Arizona, Mint Dispensary were offering free cannabis, whilst Greenhouse of Walled Lake were offering a free pre-rolled joint. If the vaccine doesn’t get you, the drugs most certainly will.
 
Some of the other companies offering incentives in the US include AT&T, Instacart, Target, Trader Joe’s, Chobani, Petco, Darden Restaurant, McDonald’s and Dollar General. This is despite the fact that there has been over 4,400 deaths reported to the VAERS database in the US following vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine.
 
However, it appears that Ohio is the place to be. Governor Mike De Wine announced that there will be five lucky winners of a cash prize of $1 million. That’s right. You could win a million dollars for simply rolling up your sleeve and taking an injection that bypassed critical animal trials. Hopefully these lucky people will actually get to enjoy their prize money.
 
Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly has stated that Australia needs to look at “as many incentives as we can” to increase vaccination rates. Part of this plan is vaccine passports. Prime Minister Scott Morrison recently announced his intentions to develop vaccine passports to allow people to travel domestically without the need for quarantine if they come from a known ‘hotspot’. This was met with severe backlash, not just from the public, but also from state premiers and even his own colleagues.
 
The Australian Immunisation Handbook states that for consent to be legally valid, “it must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”. Could incentives be considered as coercion?
 
It is difficult enough for people to find the truth amongst the government and media propaganda, let alone have incentives thrown their way to ‘push them over the line’.
 
If we were in the midst of a global pandemic so severe that we had to shut our international borders, quarantine every returning traveller for 14 days in a hotel, lockdown cities for days or weeks at a time, costing the economy billions of dollars and countless livelihoods (and lives), mandate masks in and outside, and force thousands, if not millions, of people to get tested, even when healthy, why do we need to incentivise the vaccine that is supposed to be our ‘ticket’ to freedom?
 
If this pandemic was a deadly as we are made to believe, and the vaccine was safe and effective as we have been repeatedly told, then wouldn’t people be rushing out to get it?
 
We have seen the effects of the recent lockdown in Victoria, and how there has been a surge in people receiving the vaccine. Was this done intentionally? Are our governments using draconian lockdown measures to pressure people into taking the vaccine?
 
Campaign Edge owner Dee Madigan claimed recently that “the only way to get through to people now is through a scare campaign… Or the other way to do it is to offer people incentives.” Why do people need to be scared into taking an injection with no long-term safety data for a virus with a 99.8% survival rate in those under the age of 70? This most certainly is pressuring, coercion and manipulating people into receiving the vaccine.
 
The fear campaign has been running wild since the beginning of the pandemic. According to German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, the “sole reason the PCR test is used, and used in an incorrect way, is to create enough fear that no one will question the pandemic measures being put into place and simply do as they’re told”.
 
Dr Joseph Mercola refers to the pandemic as a “casedemic” due to the constant fear around the number of ‘cases’. Cases are not a measure of severity when it comes to a disease. The government and media have continuously created fear around people who are a ‘positive case’, regardless of whether they are infectious or not. This is especially true for Australians returning from overseas.
 
The TGA’s most recent report on the number of reactions post-vaccination is nothing short of horrifying. Since the beginning of this year, there has been 1 death due to COVID-19. However, during the same period of time, there has been 210 deaths reported after receiving the vaccine, along with 22,031 adverse events.
 
Given that Australia is on track to record more deaths post-vaccination than from COVID-19 itself, why should we be incentivised into taking an experimental injection that quite clearly does more harm than good?
 
The vaccine does not provide immunity or prevent transmission. There was no statistical significance in the clinical trials to show that it prevents severe illness, hospitalisation or death. Yet, there have been thousands of adverse events and deaths reported post-vaccine in countries all over the world.
 
The media needs to stop lying to us, and the government needs to stop the rollout of the vaccine immediately.
 
Where there is risk, there must be choice. Not incentives.


13 Comments
Larry Post
6/4/2021 09:29:41 pm

It hasn't escaped notice that Quantas have gone from 'mandating' to 'Incentivising'. Keep pushing, folks, we're nearly there.

Reply
Nikki
6/6/2021 04:24:23 pm

I agree

Reply
Jeeves
6/14/2021 01:36:50 am

"there has been a surge in people receiving the vaccine. Was this done intentionally?"

I'm glad that you are asking this question. But the question is ambiguous. Was *what* done intentionally? The spread, or the lockdown? Possibly both. The story is too improbable.

Here I present two of the latest improbable events in what has become a smelly trail of very unlikely episodes.
-Melb. Interlopers into Qld
-The Amazing Appearing Delta
-An overview of the stink follows afterward.

-The interlopers.

This is improbable mathematically and can be seen as nonsense given the reporting. But it is clear who benefits from such tale.

Mathematicals------

Two people allegedly escaped Melbourne's ring of whatever, travelled through NSW and arrived in Qld.
Shortly after, they tested positive.
This is an extremely unlikely story.

Pop. of Melbourne: a flat 5 mill. Number of cases: let's say 100.

Probability of being positive in Melb: 0.00002 or 1/50000. Already suspiciously low.
Probability of being positive and interloping? Let's be generous and say 10000 people did it. P = 0.00000004

That is a likelihood of 1/25,000,000

At this point I'm going to call it. This story is made up. Who knows how much of it is false?

We could then also add the improbability of the two then being tested once in Qld, but the point is already proven.

Suspicious Reporting----------

Apart from this probability analysis we can also examine the reporting.

We were told that the woman was first tested positive, the man negative. However, we were later told that the only reason they were tested was that the bloke had a new job and had to be tested as a condition of his employer.

"In an extraordinary twist this morning, the Courier Mailreports the case was only detected when the couple came forward for testing because the husband needed negative results for work purposes." - news.com.au

Another extraordinary twist! He needed the test not she. Right? So why was she tested? Could the company have a provision that you and your spouse be tested? This seems very unlikely.

The positive was confirmed on Tues. Have they worked out whether the couple travelled for legitimate reasons or not? Still working out a plausible narrative?

The Benefits--------

The benefits of such a tale are clear.
There is no extra negative publicity around yet another quarantine breach story.
They have seeded fear in 'dozens' of targeted locations in rural NSW and the Sunshine Coast in Qld- places that would otherwise be difficult to run hoaxing campaigns.
And they have their testing and vcs projects spurred on.
It's win-win-win.

-Delta

Delta appeared out of nowhere, and was linked to nothing in the database. But they MacGyvered up a link, reportedly by retesting swabs, an exercise CHO Cheng explained had previously had "minimal value". -(ABC)
Another improbable story. Escape from quarantine but no connecting links? Even amongst the regularly tested staff? And to this day, they have no clue on how it got out.

On the 10th, as an update to this bizarre saga, and to try to paper over the cracks in the narrative, the ABC ran a story about the genomic sleuths who did the MacGyver....
Or did they do it at all?

"When India's Delta strain.... was discovered in Melbourne last week, it had authorities scrambling.

The cluster of seven cases was unrelated to others in the Victorian capital — so where had the strain come from?

Then, earlier this week, a link was found between the outbreak and a returned traveller who had been in hotel quarantine in Melbourne." -(ABC)

How did these AusTrakka geniuses perform this incredible feat?

Well, they did a simple database check.

"When the Delta variant was detected in Melbourne last week, the team ploughed through the sequences stored in the database to try and find a match in Victoria." - (ABC)

​"Ploughed through" means pressed a few keys and waited a few seconds. They read the punch card and.... the computer said "no".

"We could not find a match anywhere in the country that might explain the source of this disease," Professor Howden said. - (ABC)

Now comes the MacGyver moment.

"So AusTrakka's network of labs under the Communicable Diseases Genomics Network agreed to upload their lower quality sequences to the database to help find a match. "

"Within about 12 hours, we got all the data from around the country into a single location," Professor Howden said.

"Previously, it would have taken days or even weeks to screen the whole country." - (ABC)

Whoopie. They uploaded more data pressed a few more keys And.......What happened?
Well, we are just left hanging because that's the end of the narrative! Did they find that thing or not?

Now this is either incredibly sloppy journalism and/or these guys never found a match as they said.
The story even features commentary from three AusTrakka's, one who provides some of the narrative of the sleuth work, (indicating inside involvement), and two who co-lead AusTrakka, yet none

Reply
Jeeves
6/14/2021 01:42:32 am

of them could provide that eureka moment when they found the match!
So this is why I ask. Did this match ever occur?
And what ever did happen to the "retesting the swab" story? Hey! The cracks are still showing guys! Get sommore dang paper!

Overview

The Wollert Man saga has led to lockdown in Vic and further trouble in NSW and Qld. Mayhem in three states. The equation goes a little something like this.....
Doors were open in Adelaide quarantine within a 30 min period. Because of super mutant virulence, Wollert was infected. Bull.
+Wollert man was released while positive. Bull.
+Wollert Man was tested positive in Vic. Bull.
as discussed earlier, they tested the f out of anyone anywhere near him, 150 odd close contacts, three household family members and many tens of thousands of distant contacts, and got a BIG FAT ZERO. Bull. For a quarantine busting mutant strain? Double bull.
+Weeks later the strain re-emerged causing Lockdown town! Bull.
+This was extended at least partially due to the improbable appearance of Delta. Bull.
+Bullshit Delta link story. Bull.
+Bullshit interloper story. Bull.

= Total Bull

Reply
Larry Post
6/14/2021 03:19:04 am

Great breakdown, Jeeves! In fact the original SARS was grown in a culture medium of pseudoscience and media hype as well. The lengths they had to go to to confirm close contact included being on the same floor of a hotel.

Only then could they make their crass observations fit the contagion model. They just won't let it go. This is a well-worn path in virological public-health nonsense.

Of course, now, it's an argument for having everybody's genetic data stored centrally and mined and mined and mined.

There is, of course, another piece in the puzzle, namely the false positives thing. A 95% reliable test will pick up 50 false positives per thousand tests. If there are next to zero actual cases, then the chances of a positive result NOT being false are extremely small.

So, not only is their explanation completely bogus for where and how this case brought their sickness from VIC to QLD, so is the fact this healthy person is even a case. Case of what? They got all the way to QLD and started their job induction without even knowing they were ill! Shock! Horror!

It's as if the authorities and/or the media actually want to find an outbreak somehow, whether it is there or not! How strange!

Reply
Jeeves
6/15/2021 12:07:16 am

Thanks Larry.
I'm very interested to hear that the same sorts of things were happening way back with CVD 1.0. Are you aware of another model that fits the spread pattern better than the contagion model? This very well argued and evidenced source claims that there has been deliberate spread. http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184&sid=c3bf0f75745a26ec9ec8ca75edc5174a This does seem to explain some things such as the targeted attacks on aged care and the Ruby Princess debacle, and the spread to Iran before any significant spread in China outside of Wuhan. Though some material presented is just a bit too technical for me.
There are certainly some strange things going on.
I'm paying close attention to outbreaks in Australia and have seen improbable spread in quarantine again and again, and yet have often seen little to no spread by the same folk out in public.
I even recall a case of spread in NZ quarantine where the two people were on different floors!
As for false positives, their testing guidelines indicate that they don't rely on the test alone. They decide whether a positive is a 'case' based on whether the subject has been in probable contact (or overseas) and interpret the result within that context. This way it looks like there are no false positives. Sometimes when they get it wrong they blame 'shedding'. False positive is basically a rude word in the Australian media.
Australia is absolutely an extreme case in the world. Ill or not, just one 'case' is all it takes for hysteria. Then it's Shut It Down! This ever present lockdown threat is a terror weapon against the people.

Larry Post
6/15/2021 07:20:41 am

Whoops this may have gotten out of order, Jeeves, I wasn't sure which reply button to use.

All of which brings me to the Wuhan Lab/gain of function thing.

Well, I call BS on this as well. It was Info Wars who first put this out, and they are truly compromised. The important thing for the scam is that we all continue to believe there is a virus.

The main counter to the scamdemic narrative is there is no real problem, this is no worse than the flu. If we all keep believing that, then they can turn the numbers up at any time and prove us wrong, force us all back in our box.

So, bat, lab, outer space, Plum Island... Indian variants and Brazil variants that are unheard of in India or Brazil... it matters not where the virus comes from as long as we believe it is there. So, keep the conspiracy theorists happy and throw Fauxi under the bus. His work is done anyway.

I don't believe there can be a lab-derived bio-weapon here. If there is, then the US tax payer should be demanding a refund, because it was lousy product that didn't work. Except strangely it worked in China in Jan 2020, according to some really badly done propaganda videos of people collapsing in the streets.

Whatever Fauci thought he was working on, the product has not been a deadly contagious virus, because it has yet to be proven a virus even exists.

The genetic sequence for this virus was worked out by Prof Dr Drosten In Germany on his laptop from zero direct knowledge. So now we have an 'artificial virus' because the genetic sequence is not natural. Duh! Garbage In, Garbage Out.

No, when people wake up to the real truth, there is no effing virus, there has never been a deadly viral pandemic (truly, not even 1919)... well, I wonder if they ever will.

Larry Post
6/15/2021 07:04:30 am

Gosh, Jeeves, so many big subjects in such a short space, because there is a grand conjoring trick being played on us with many mental underpinnings that go back a long way. Once you know how the trick is done, then you can see the magician hide the card up his sleeve and nothing can make you unsee it.

How many red pills can one take?

1) contagion - when leaves fall off trees, do we first assume contagion? We would if we had been taught since birth that there is a seasonal tree virus, and the main symptom is leaf fall. Guess what - colds and flu are not contagious. They have tested the contagion model again and again and failed to show it even exists. A common environment model fits better - weather, precise location, general health status ie. what's in the local grocery store, water supply, air etc etc.. The British Government ran a programme for 40 years to study the common cold, and in all that time they failed to even spread one. How inconvenient.

2) illness. Well we are all sick, if we don't need any symptoms in order to be sick. Medicine was founded on human suffering. Now, you can go to the doctor in great pain and be told there is nothing wrong. You can be fit as a flea and be declared sick because of a colour change in a test tube. But science is about real world experience first, laboratory second. Unless we have all been taught not to trust our real world experience.

3)virus. No virus has ever been proven to be the cause of any illness. When you look at the scientific underpinnings of the viral contagious illness theory, they are shockingly bad. Like, putting a rat kidney in a blender, filtering out the liquid, declaring that is the purified virus, injecting it directly into the brain of a monkey, then when the money dies, declare it a dangerous virus. No, it's an insane scientist, that's what it is. Look the works of most of the famous virologists and you'll see it truly is 'eye of newt wing of bat' level stuff.

4) outbreak. We don't need a deadly virus to explain ANYTHING we have seen in the last 18 months. Pre-existing problems (air pollution in Italy, Wuhan), fear of a virus, disruption to basic social systems on which life depends, overzealous medical treatment can explain it all. And now, the vaccines. India was doing fine until they started vaccinating. Then the curve went vertical. It has happened before. Pasteur wiped out whole villages with his vaccines and declared it a success. He was another mad man. The Phillipines never knew Smallpox until the British arrived and began vaccinating everybody, then they had one of the biggest outbreaks in history.

Basically, there is no pandemic. All the signs of one are a conjoring trick, and it all follows a very basic principle: "test and ye shall find".

In short, the authorities WANT a pandemic for political reasons, just like they wanted fear of terrorists in the early 2000s. So they collude with the media to create one. It isn't even that difficult, you just need to be well connected. Think, Bill Gates, funding everything from labs to the WHO to NGOs to charities to the effing BBC. Basically bribing everybody to say exactly what he wants them to say, and shutting up others. But not just him - Zuck, Dosey, Beastos, Obaaaah-ma, Denial Andrews, Fauxi, Soros... there is a lot of money making sure this happens.

I can go on about this all day. But the point is there is nothing happening that hasn't happened a million times before, except this time it's on steroids.

This is big business. Like the Central Bank illusion, the Vax illusion is collapsing. They need something to prop it all up another ten years, or else wipe out all us useless eaters so they can hide their utter failure and begin again. Except the failure is so huge it is becoming too bloody obvious.

You simply can't fool all hte people all the time.

If you want some further reading, check out Janine Roberts' jaw-dropping "Fear of the invisible" and also "Virus Mania" by Torsten Engelbrecht and Klaus Kohnlein.

If you can't afford books or need to get started sooner, go back through Jon Rappoport's blog "no more fake news dot com". Al are stunning resources.

For an historical perspective look at Ethel D Hume's explosive "Bechamp or Pasteur, a lost chapter in the history of biology".

Best
L

Reply
Jeeves
6/17/2021 01:25:41 am

You raise many interesting points.
I generally agree, but on many points, I am not well informed.
To be brief, I see the CVD scare as a tool to help usher in the technocratic one world gov. Is CVD all bark and no bite? I have a hard time believeing there is no virus, or at least some sort of killing agent. This is mostly because, through my Ruby Princess research, I can see that the event was planned, (Exercise Emergensea Detour), and shielded (Special Commission etc) and they managed to kill 28 people somehow. Then there are the targeted attacks on aged care centres starting with Newmarch House in Australia but also successful in Italy, Spain, NY, the UK and Canada to name some. Or did 40 odd never really die at St Basil's?... Maybe.
Thanks for the book recommendations. I've read a few Rappaport and Engelbrecht/Kohnlein articles, but haven't been willing to go with them all the way...... as yet.
Saw 60 minutes swine flu 1976 episode just recently. https://thecovidblog.com/2021/02/26/60-minutes-1979-swine-flu-investigation-has-uncanny-resemblances-to-covid-2020-21/ Very informative. What is your source regarding the Spanish Flu?

Reply
Larry Post
6/17/2021 07:08:33 am

I repeat, we do not need a virus to explain any of that. Many of the deaths in those places were already happening - Wuhan China and Northern Italy have had huge problems of respiratory disease for years due to air pollution. NY, LA likewise. And that was the year nobody died of flu, so, they've taken numbers out of one column and written them in another. In many instances that is it.

Brazil, massive issues of corruption. It is doubtful how many of the patients really existed, but plenty of money changed hands.

The UK, very close to home for me. When the first 'death' was announced, I guessed the hospital. Royal Berks is a Dickensian hell hole. They tried to kill my mother there through ineptitude and frank elder abuse. When the first case got 'confirmed', I tell you, somebody there lucked out big time.

etc etc

Ruby Princess, flagship WiFi system with 5G repeaters in every single room. Same with Wuhan, flagship 5G system turns on, next day people get sick by the thousand.

As for care homes, well, take sick people out of hospital where they rightly need to be... some will die.

Make room for them by moving people around in care homes, dilute the care there, spread fear and rumours, more will die.

Keep out relatives and other visitors - who are the single best safety mechanism in elder care - many more will die.

Honestly, if you want to kill people in care homes, isolate them, frighten them, and keep their families out, and watch them drop like flies.

And on and on. I could do this all day. The fact is, of all the gross and deadly assaults on our bodies and minds in the last year, why is it that somehow the resulting carnage and collateral damage is suddenly all the proof we need of a new virus that has never been isolated, never purified, never proven to be the cause of any disease...

You seem like a logical person, but this stuff is fucking medieval superstition, frankly. And the human race has not advanced in hundreds of years.

Larry Post
6/17/2021 07:13:59 am

Don't get me started on masks, ventilators and food shortages, and the money hospitals and health authorities get for having cases...

Jeeves
10/9/2021 11:31:09 pm

Thanks Larry. Having now closely inspected the alleged CVD deaths in Australia, and especially the death of Adriana Takara, I am finding I agree with your perspective more and more. If there is a CVD, why do they need to fraudulently assign deaths? I reckon that the cruise ship and aged care events happen as you say. Possibly there was some poisoning going on also. A caveat on Rappoport - he apparently appears on Info Wars who I agree are a disinfo outlet. Not to say that all he says is garbage, but I sure don't trust the guy.

Reply
Larry Post
10/10/2021 05:17:27 am

Jeeves, great to hear back from you!

Nothing I have said there should be taken as a watertight case. The point is that science depends on competing hypotheses, but there is a world of vested interests trying to turn it into a multiple choice quiz with only one right answer for every question. Or worse, a case of choosing sides: you are either pro everything else the government is doing "because covid" or you are anti science so move aside, we don't want to listen. This is a major mindset problem and the result is mass homicide on scale never seen.

Regarding Rappoport, let's face it, there are no perfect sources. We hear as many cases as possible but the onus is on us to think critically always.

I like him because he is an ethical journalist who does his homework. Oh, to be able to research half as well as he can.

As for Info Wars, I don't pay them much attention, but as my friend Tim once said "every rock band has played at least one good song". Alex Jones has done a lot of damage but also done a lot of good. Controlled opposition? Too many layers to that question to get started.

But the worst source of all is surely the mainstream media. If we're going to taint others by association let's start with anybody who has ever been on TV.

I wish I were one of those people who can say a whole lot in a single sentence, but I'm not.

Take care :-)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Our articles and rebuttal pieces are written by our writers on our volunteer team

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020

    Categories

    All
    Covid
    Rebuttal
    Vaccine Education
    Vaccine Injury Stories

    RSS Feed

Home

Who We Are
Vision and Mission 
Our Objectives
Contact Us

Truth Day

Truth Day Questions
Research & Resources
Letters to Your MPs
Recommended Reading, Viewing & Tools

Connect

Newsletter Sign Up
Social Media
Join Our Team
​Calendar Of Events

News

Picture
© Copyright 2022 Vaccine Choice Australia                      Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • TRUTH DAY
  • Current MP Letters
  • Rebuttal and News
  • RESOURCES
  • CONNECT
  • Write to your MPs
  • Stand Up Australia