Pfizer Vaccine Study Should be Suspended Immediately According to Ex-Pfizer Head of Respiratory Research
“On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for the EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).”
“Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.”
The doctors state that the testing of the vaccine on humans is unethical because the risk of disease or possible vaccine benefit cannot be determined with certainty, due to many different PCR tests of highly varying quality. They continue by demanding that the risks already known from previous studies must be excluded through means such as animal studies.
There are a number of major concerns according to Dr. Wodarg and Dr Yeadon. One of those concerns is the formation of “non-neutralizing antibodies”, which can result in antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This means that these antibodies can cause an exaggerated immune response if a person is confronted with the “wild” virus. Experiments were conducted on cats, whereby they initially tolerated the vaccine. However, after they were exposed to the wild virus, they eventually died. Previous vaccine efforts against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have revealed similar findings. A study conducted on ferrets showed a robust antibody response to the vaccine, but when the ferrets were challenged with the wild virus, they all became severely ill and died. This is a serious concern and one that should be thoroughly investigated before a vaccine is rolled out.
Another concern regarding the vaccine is the potential to cause infertility in females. The mechanism behind the vaccine is that is produces antibodies against the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain “syncytin-homologous proteins”. These proteins are essential for the formation of the placenta. If the vaccine triggers an immune reaction against syncytin-1, it could result in “infertility of indefinite duration” in vaccinated women. Furthermore, syncytin-1 is not only present in females, it is also present in male sperm as well. The risks of sterility apply to not only vaccinated females, but to vaccinated males as well. Due to the short nature of the current trials, it is impossible to determine whether the vaccine will cause sterility in men and women.
The Pfizer vaccine contains a substance known as polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against PEG. This means that 70% of people can develop an allergic, and potentially fatal, reaction to the vaccine. Yes, you read that right. 70% of people could develop a potentially fatal reaction to the vaccine. If alarm bells weren’t already ringing by now, they should be.
The authors argue that the short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects of the vaccine. The average duration of vaccine development is 10-12 years. The Pfizer vaccine has been developed in 6-12 months. In 2009, the swine flu pandemic swept across the world. A vaccine was rushed to market without the usual safety studies being completed. The vaccine caused narcolepsy in 1,000 adults and children across Europe, resulting in chronic fatigue, difficulty sleeping at night, night terrors, hallucinations and a range of mental health problems. In 2014, the UK government was sued for £60 million by patients who suffered brain damage as a result of taking the swine flu vaccine. Lawyer Peter Todd stated that the “victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication”.
The Pfizer vaccine has NOT been tested on “children, pregnant women, people taking medications and individuals with comorbidities”. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as of 2 December 2020, there have been 249,570 deaths in the US involving COVID-19. 89 of these deaths were in children under the age of 15. That equates to 0.036% of the total deaths in the US involving COVID-19. Children are the least affected demographic of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and dying from COVID-19. The UK Government’s regulatory approval of Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine for COVID-19 states that the “safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in children under 16 years of age have not yet been established”. Why do children need the vaccine when they are the least likely to contract the virus, let alone die from it?
There is very limited data on the number of pregnant women that have either contracted SARS-CoV-2 or died from COVID-19. In fact, ABC News just reported that a woman in Singapore who was infected with COVID-19 when she was pregnant has given birth to a healthy baby boy with antibodies. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), it is still unclear if a “pregnant woman with COVID-19 can pass the virus to her foetus or baby during pregnancy or delivery”. If we don’t have clear information, there is no way to know if a vaccine will affect the foetus or baby. It’s worth noting that studies have never been conducted on the effects of any vaccines on pregnant women and their unborn babies. Furthermore, a study published by the National Centre for Biotechnology Information showed “spontaneous abortion was associated with influenza vaccination in the preceding 28 days”. The study went on to say that “evidence of safety in early pregnancy is limited”. Thankfully the UK Government’s regulatory approval of Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine for COVID-19 states that the “COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy” and that “pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination”. The website also states that the vaccine should “not be used during breast feeding” because it is “unknown” if the vaccine is excreted in human milk. It is critical that these safety studies are conducted prior to rolling out a vaccine, especially when it comes to the health of a pregnant woman and her unborn baby.
People taking medications and individuals with comorbidities are amongst the most vulnerable when it comes to dying with COVID-19. These are the people that the government is trying to protect with lockdowns and vaccines. According to the CDC, the average number of comorbidities for each death with COVID-19 is 2.6. This demographic of people already has a compromised immune system. It is therefore imperative that proper safety studies are conducted on this group of people prior to giving them a vaccine. Shockingly, no safety studies on this vulnerable group have been conducted.
There are many other grave concerns when it comes to the Pfizer vaccine trials:
The BioNtech/Pfizer vaccine has been approved for emergency use in the UK and is being rolled out this week. 800,000 doses are due to arrive, with a total of 40 million doses ordered. This is despite the fact that Pfizer have not even finished analysing their data, let alone it being peer-reviewed by independent scientific bodies.
Dr Wodarg and Dr Yeadon are experts in their chosen fields. We, as well as governments all across the world, need to listen to them. The Pfizer vaccine is using new, experimental and highly controversial mRNA technology, which has not only bypassed critical animal studies, it has never been approved for use in human trials, even though it has been attempted for the last three decades.
It is impossible to ensure this vaccine is safe, especially given that so many questions remain unanswered? How can the public possibly feel comfortable receiving a vaccine without proper safety studies being conducted? Would you feel confident if your children were to receive this vaccine with an inherent lack of data on the potential adverse reactions? Would you feel reassured with your elderly parents or grandparents receiving the vaccine when their immune systems are already compromised, and with a vaccine that could potentially trigger an even stronger immune reaction if they do happen to contract the virus?
Where there is risk, there must be choice. We have the right to medical freedom, to body autonomy and to make our own health care decisions. Governments do not have the right to take this away from us. We must stand united and fight for our medical freedom.
Our articles and rebuttal pieces are written by our writers on our volunteer team