Vaccine Choice Australia
  • Home
  • TRUTH DAY
  • Current MP Letters
  • Rebuttal and News
  • RESOURCES
  • CONNECT
  • Write to your MPs
  • Stand Up Australia

Say No to Domestic Vaccine Passports

8/18/2021

18 Comments

 
Picture
​WA Premier Mark McGowan became the first premier in Australia to introduce domestic vaccine passports.
 
Travellers entering Western Australia from New South Wales will have to show proof that they have had at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. They must also provide evidence of a negative COVID-19 PCR test in the 72 hours prior to departure, and they must comply with the existing quarantine and testing measures.
 
The new measures will also apply for people arriving from all states and territories that are deemed “high risk” in the future. According to the Western Australian government, a state or territory will be considered high risk if it records an average of 50 COVID-19 cases a day.
 
Mr McGowan acknowledged that “these are tough measures but they are necessary to protect the state”.
 
“I think this is actually a template for other states to look at, should they want to put in place measures to protect themselves from the raging outbreak in New South Wales”, said Mr McGowan.
 
It didn’t take long for Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk to follow Mr McGowan’s advice.
 
It will be a requirement for essential workers who need to cross into Queensland from New South Wales to be vaccinated. Ms Palaszczuk said that “we are extremely concerned about the possibility of this virus coming into Queensland so we will take every precaution we possibly can”.
 
Which begs the question, who qualifies as an essential worker? Does earning an income and supporting your family make you essential? Does paying your mortgage and children’s school fees make you essential? Does running a business to support the economy make you essential? We are all essential. The country wouldn’t operate without each and every one of us playing our part and contributing to society.
 
Prime Minister Scott Morrison publicly supported the introduction of domestic vaccine passports by saying “I think that's very consistent with what the national plan is seeking to achieve”. However, he stopped short of saying they would be a permanent fixture.
 
“It’s a decision for now because borders exist now… The whole point of getting to higher and higher levels of vaccination – in particular when we get to 80 per cent – is that’s when we’re saying goodbye to lockdowns... When there are no lockdowns there should be no borders… We’re not running a mandatory vaccination program… In specific cases, we may seek to do that for public health reasons. But otherwise, that’s just not how we do things in Australia.”
 
Let’s see if he is true to his word.
 
Perhaps Mr McGowan and Ms Palaszczuk, along with Mr Morrison, should look at the data coming out of various countries with high vaccination rates.
 
At the time of writing, according to Our World in Data, 81% of the eligible population in Iceland are vaccinated, with 75% fully vaccinated. However, the Intensive Care Unit at the National University Hospital is in danger of being overwhelmed due to an increased in COVID-19 cases.
 
73 people were hospitalised, with approximately 67% fully vaccinated. 23 people were in the emergency department, with 17 fully vaccinated and 6 unvaccinated. Out of these people, 6 out of the 11 patients in ICU were fully vaccinated. Approximately two-thirds of the current cases are in people who have been vaccinated.
 
The Prime Minister has stated that lockdowns and border closures will ease when 80% of the population is vaccinated. Perhaps he should look at what is happening in Iceland with 80% of the population vaccinated.
 
In Singapore, 77% of the population is vaccinated, with 71% fully vaccinated. In the most recent outbreak in July, out of 1,096 locally transmitted cases, 44% were in fully vaccinated people, 30% were in partially vaccinated people and 25% were in unvaccinated people. 1% was unknown.
 
If Mr McGowan or Ms Palaszczuk believe that the vaccine will prevent cases in their states, they better think again. The data clearly shows that the vaccine is ineffective at preventing someone from developing COVID-19.
 
Israel, often considered the testing ground due to their quick roll out of the Pfizer vaccine, is also experiencing a spike in cases. So far, 68% of the population is vaccinated, with 63% fully vaccinated. Recent data shows that 84% of the cases in those above the age of 19 were in fully vaccinated individuals.
 
In Massachusetts in the US, there was a recent outbreak of 469 cases according to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published by the CDC. 69% of eligible residents were vaccinated against COVID-19, yet 74% of the cases occurred in fully vaccinated people.
 
Why do our politicians and health officials continue to ignore the data? Can it be any more obvious?
 
The TGA’s Australian Public Assessment Report for the Pfizer vaccine states that a “correlate of protection has yet to be established” and that the “duration of protection” is unknown.
 
What is known is that the vaccine is ineffective at protecting against COVID-19. If this is the case, how can Mr McGowan and Ms Palaszczuk require people to have had at least one dose of the vaccine to cross the state border to WA and QLD from NSW?
 
It is also known that the effectiveness is significantly lower after the first dose compared to the second. This sets a dangerous precedent for other states to follow.
 
Why are people being prevented from earning an income for refusing to inject a product into their body with no long-term safety data?
 
Why are families being separated from each other for choosing not to take a vaccine with more adverse events in 6 months than for all other vaccines in 30 years?
 
Why are people not being allowed to say goodbye to dying loved ones for choosing not to be part of a mass population experiment?
 
Whether you choose to take the vaccine or not is your choice. The point is it should remain a choice.
 
What no one has the right to do, including the Prime Minister and state premiers, is coerce, force or pressure people into taking an experimental injection, and restricting their liberties and freedoms if they refuse to do so.
 
We cannot let this continue any longer. It’s time to stand up Australia. Enough is enough.

18 Comments
Boris Gaspar
8/22/2021 12:15:56 pm

It's clear these politicians are moving towards mandatory vaccinations, no boarders, global government based on the World Economic Forum (WEF) plan. This dovetails with the UN agenda 2021 - 30.

We must stop believing their lies and narrative inconsistencies. They are like dishonest salesmen who try to reassure an unsuspecting buyer to believe they are not trying to hoodwink them but all the time they twist and turn the tales to suit the audience. It's all BS to con the public..

Reply
edward roose
8/22/2021 12:57:45 pm

I absolutely disagree with the notion of Vaccine passports or any vaccine coercion. It's utterly reprehensible that our elected officials are supporting such tyranny while pretending that it's optional to take an experimental and morally diabolical vaccine which is tainted by the horror of abortion.

Reply
Shane
8/22/2021 12:58:13 pm

Say no to any vaccine passports. I want to support Craig Kelly.

Thanks Kindly
Shane

Reply
Maria
8/22/2021 10:27:54 pm

I definitely do not support vaccine passports. I agree with Craig Kelly and fully support him. My body my choice. No one should be coerced into taking an experimental drug that is ineffective and has not gone through rigorous testing.

Reply
Amal Michel
9/2/2021 11:49:51 pm

I am so frustrated and angry about this whole COVID-19 "Pandemic" garbage. NO Vaccine Passports, NO to any of these vaccines, NO to all of it. Maria thank you for also being against this too...so glad to see others saying no to this.

Stefan
8/22/2021 02:52:16 pm

Informed consent, not civil conscription, it's unconstitutional and undemocratic!

Reply
robin forster
8/22/2021 03:31:35 pm

Freedom of choice does not involve having medical procedures against ones will.

Reply
Rosie Maclaine
8/22/2021 06:57:55 pm

I want to say no the domestic passport as well, this will certainly divide the country even more than iyt is now

Reply
Roswita Ragg
8/23/2021 07:04:26 pm

Freedom of speech, & I would like for Gladys berekjilian to step down as she has ruin the whole Australian nation.

Reply
Jeves
8/24/2021 11:24:27 pm

An alleged CVD death in Sydney
(Note -hyperlinks to all sources could not be transferred)

The analysis below demonstrates the sickeningly low tactics our officials and the media apparatus are willing to use to push vcs. Adriana Midori Takara died, allegedly due to CVD, on the
25 th of July in Sydney, Australia. But is this, in fact, true? The mainstream reportage of this woman’s death has been exhaustively dissected by myself and Stinky. Careful scrutiny reveals a horrible truth. This is a very important story.

The key themes of the story are commonly framed in this way:

"Adriana Midori Takara was just 39 and had no underlying health conditions but when she contracted CVD, she went downhill quickly and never recovered.
Now her brother and best friend want the arguments over vcs to stop and for people to remember that lives and loved ones are being lost… "

She is reported to have died nine or ten days after contracting CVD.
She was:
 Young and healthy
 Got CVD
 Died because of CVD
So go and get vcs

"(Friend and brother respectively) Fernanda and Helio said they believe Ms Takara
hadn't been vcated yet due to her age and not yet being eligible."

She was
 Not vcated

->Was she actually vcated?

The above quote is based on A Current Affair’s interview of Fernanda and Helio. It is used to insinuate that she was NOT vcated. Yet, this is not based on *knowing* that she was. That Helio is only making a presumption is clear by his remarks in the ACA video interview. 1

It was widely reported that Ms Takara had tried to get vcated but was unsuccessful. However, these particular insertions are never quoted nor unattributed to anyone. 2

SBS provide the most direct quote:

“She didn’t have time to get the vcs,” says Marilena Ribeiro, aclose friend from São Paulo, Brazil

Apparently, the friend on another continent knew for certain, while her brother in Media overwhelmingly indicate she was NOT vcated, though supporting statements for this are weak.

In any case, this issue could easily be cleared up by the authorities, even today. They had the perfect opportunity to do this when asked about it at the second press conference after Takara’s death, on the 26 th July:

JOURNALIST
(21:59)
Sorry, a woman who died, the 38 year old (inaudible) can you just provide some clarity
there, she was not vcated or was she? There’s some people, some people close to us
suggesting she actually had, had at least one dose of vcs
NSW Chief Health Officer Dr Kerry Chant
Look I'll have to check that. I, I was unaware that she was vcated. The advice I had was that she did, umm, not have any underlying health issues, but I will confirm that…

No follow up questions were asked. This was the entirety of comment on the death during the 48 minute press conference. At the following day’s conference, another 48 minute affair, Chant did not bother to confirm anything. All of the journalists also forgot to ask. There was and remains a collective amnesia - vcs status was never subsequently clarified by any authority. 4

Inference –There has been no official confirmation on vcs status because it is known for a fact that she was vcated.

->There are further indications that she was vcated

As quoted above, the day after Ms Takara’s death was announced, a journalist stated:

There’s some people … close to us suggesting she actually had … at least one dose of vcs

The use of “us” indicates that more than one journalist had heard this. Rebecca Weisser in The Spectator reinforces this point:

"When Adriana Midori Takara died last weekend … after testing positive for CVD, …(a)llegations emerged quickly that there was more to the story. Friends in the Brazilian community said that she had received her first jab just before she tested positive" 5

From the very beginning journalists had received word from “close” that Ms Takara was vcated. 6 These voices were deliberately ignored in favour of word that was distant or
unsure.

The media deliberately chose to spin the story in a way that presented Ms Takara as unvcated.

When such egregious spin has been used, this necessarily casts doubt on all of the other reported “facts”. Can we be sure that she ever actually tested positive? ->CVD symptoms?

There is no reported
 Loss of smell
 Sore throat
 Cough (dry or otherwise) or
 fever

There is just a single mention of classic CVD symptoms and that is from the deceased’s boyfriend Khalid. He was interviewed by the Daily Telegraph (paywalled) a week after the death. Quotes from the interview were regurgitated by outlets such as Mail Online :

'She went straight into a quarantine hotel and the next day, the Friday, she was vomiting, had headaches and

Reply
Jeves
8/24/2021 11:26:49 pm

ctd...
was struggling to breathe. They put her in an induced coma so her body
could recover but she never did…’ Khalid said 7

She was a positive case and without even a cough she suddenly had “difficulty breathing”?

Though widely reported as a CVD death, just a single reference to classic CVD symptoms exists in all the reportage: “headaches and struggling to breathe”.

->Other symptoms and her treatment

Around half of all articles do not provide any information on Adriana’s actual symptoms or treatment. Those that do, report details that are not congruous with CVD.

News.com.au report that she had “emergency surgery” but give no specifics. Surgery for CVD?

The ABC, who have been one of the most guarded in their reporting, gave a single reference to symptoms in a TV segment.

“Not long after being admitted to hospital Ms Takara suffered a heart attack which led to her rapid deterioration” 8

The Mail Online provide corroboration and more:

'A day or two after admission, Adriana complained of chest pains. Medical staff assessed her having a heart attack,' her friend Jules Pedrosa wrote on Fakebook.
'She needed immediate surgery and an instrument (don't know if it was a pacemaker or
otherwise) had to assist her heart to maintain a regular rhythm.
'Adriana's health condition worsened after a few days and further tests confirmed that her
heart had a "viral infection"….
'Communication was one-way because she had been unconscious for several hours after her emergency heart surgery.' 9

Pedrosa may not have his facts straight. Nevertheless, he corroborates that she had a heart attack and states twice that she required heart surgery. Other details are reported
in addition to chest pain and heart attack. Cousin of Adriana, Renata Takara, was quoted
by the Guardian:

“I learned about her infection on Thursday when she had surgery on her leg to fight thrombosis. On the weekend, she needed a second surgery on the other leg because of the same reason, but the doctor said that she was too debilitated, too weak, she would not stand anaesthesia.

Renata appears to be the only source who mentions thrombosis. Thrombosis has not been reported online by any Australian based outlet except by The Daily Telegraph
(paywalled). 10 There are no official statements about any of Ms Takara’s symptoms or treatment. They do not even state whether she died of, or even with, CVD. 11

Headaches may be caused by blood clotting. Heart attack can be caused by blood clotting. Thrombosis is blood clotting.

As is typical with CVD deaths, NSW Health officials did not comment on the cause of Takara’s death. The media always present CVD as the cause. However, if the respiratory
disease CVD can cause the symptoms reported, it is extremely atypical. The symptoms *are* indicative of catastrophic blood clotting and blood clotting is an acknowledged
reaction to vcs. Since the public is largely in the dark about her thrombosis and completely in the dark about her having been vcated, they are prevented from making the vcs-bloodclot connection.

Conclusion

In order to support the chosen narrative, the reportage of this alleged CVD death is highly biased and downright deceptive. Authorities are very tight-lipped.
Indications Ms Takara was NOT vcated have been trumpeted while opposing voices have been deliberately ignored. 12 Authorities do not say, because they know very well that she was and the media are not asking.
Despite the biases, the media could not conjure up CVD-like symptoms beyond “headaches” and “struggling to breathe”. Due to bias, reports of heart attack and surgery are sparse, while blood clotting is almost entirely absent from the Australian reportage.
On this also, there is no official comment.

It is clear that Ms Takara was, in fact, vcated. Further, it is highly likely she reacted to the vcs, (perhaps in combination with a corona virus), with catastrophic blood clotting that affected some, or all, of her brain, heart and legs. She had emergency surgery, to her heart and or her legs which may have been
amputated. 13 However, the very best help could not save her and she soon died.

The truth has been twisted to the point of inversion and this is incredibly sick.
This death is right now being used to scare people to get vcated. And the death was most likely caused by vcation.
To the people pushing vcs, it is all worth it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Note: CVD, vcs, vcated, vcsrs etc, Fakebook, and Pizer have been used to replace other obvious words

1. Perth Now relies on a Fakebook post by an (unnamed) friend who they do not even bother to quote:

According to another friend’s Facebook post, Ms Takara and her boyfriend were unvcated when they contracted the virus.

2. In t

Reply
Jeves
8/24/2021 11:28:24 pm

Final notes ctd...

2. In the interview, Helio says:

What I know is because she was 39 it (was) still not her age to be able to make a booking for vcs, that is all that what I know

3. Despite having been interviewed, and though he was the closest to her at the time, there are no reported comments from Ms Takara’s boyfriend regarding her vcs status.

4. Only Weisser’s Spectator article bothered to report the fact that the question was asked at all.

5. Weisser draws the same logical inference that I made earlier: that the authorities know she was vcated.

Yet when a journalist told NSW chief health officer Kerry Chant … Chant replied that she’d have to check…. It was an odd comment because Chant should be briefed on the vcs status of every CVD victim since it is the first question that every journalist wants answered. Yet days later Chant has yet to confirm or deny Adriana’s vcs status. It floats in the air like a spectral phantom.

However, Weisser goes on to argue that if Ms Takara was treated with ivermectin she would have been fine. Any admission that Ms Takara had blood clotting, or heart surgery would destroy this argument, so either she does not know, or conveniently, has omitted it.

6. Many other journalists heard also, albeit indirectly, since they were at the conference and presumably were listening. Others would have known by viewing the conference online.

7. Oddly, six days earlier, the very same words appear to have been attributed to Marlene Coimbra by the Gold Coast Bulletin. Coimbra, despite merely being Ms Takara’s migration consultant,
knows many of the details of what occurred. She also has a knack for spouting lines that perfectly
suit the mainstream narrative, such as this in The Australian:

I hope this unfortunate case will be a wake-up call for those who still have any doubt about the need to get the jab

And this doozy reported by Mamamia and cited from The Daily Telegraph:

She was unconscious the whole time that she was there and on her last day, Saturday, a few blocks away, the anti-vcsrs were protesting.

8. No source is given by news.com.au nor the ABC for the information quoted.

9. It is clear that 7 News also cite this same Fakebook source.

10. The Guardian.com and Mail Online are UK based. Despite having been interviewed, there is no reported comment about thrombosis, heart attack nor on Ms Takara’s treatment by neither
brother Helio, nor by boyfriend Khalid in the freely accessible online media.

11. NSW Health state that the death is “CVD-related”. In the first press conference, instead of clear unequivocal statements, words were carefully chosen to insinuate the chosen narrative:

NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian-
"We had two deaths overnight. A woman in her 70s, but also a woman in her 30s with no pre-existing conditions. So if anybody thinks this is a disease just affecting older people, please think again….
please note that younger people without pre-existing conditions can also fall victim to this cruel disease

Senior NSW Public Health official Dr Jeremy McAnulty
"Um, sadly we've been notified of two deaths overnight... A woman in her late 30s died from the Sydney CDB (sic) area had die, has died and a woman in her 70s from southwest Sydney has died. "

Died from what? The second conference has been covered. At the third, NSW Health Minister Brad Hazard chooses these words:

"And as we saw, very sadly, the day before yesterday, um, a young woman only 38 years old with no
other illnesses, died. So I think that’s why we keep saying…. "

12. Note how easy it is to bury inconvenient voices. Only Weisser and the anonymous journalist at the press conference acknowledged these voices existed, and even they did not bother to quote them.

13 As reported in the Mail Online, a Minnesota woman had a similar reaction days after her Pizer vcs: chest pains, arterial blood clotting and multiple organ inflammation. Both her legs were amputated. Predictably though:
"the CDC determined that CVD and MIS (multiple inflammatory syndrome) combined were the cause of her complications"
and
"The agency could not determine whether the vcs played a role in her condition"

Reply
Maria Ziegler
8/26/2021 07:48:24 pm

No to Vaccine Passports, No to Mandatory Vaccinations and No to Mandatory Covid-19 Injection, and No to Abuse of Power from our elected and non-elected Officials.

Reply
Rachel Corneal
8/28/2021 08:14:58 am

No to Vaccine Passports, No to Mandatory Vaccinations and No to Mandatory Covid-19 Injection, and No to Abuse of Power from our elected and non-elected officials

Reply
Alan Bainbridge link
8/28/2021 02:59:37 pm

Never got on a plane or gone anywhere and asked everyone around me have you had the Measles Jab Chickenpox Jab Poliomyelitis Jab or Flu Jab Blah Blah Blah Nope but for this one we do for some suspicious reason. 310,000 thousand people in Australia 2019
had cases of the Flu and over 800 people died even with Vaccines but people had a choice to do so or not that is called Freedoms of choice in Australia. Unfortunately there’s a massive Honey Pot which gets in the way for everyone in Power and it’s all linked to one person and the dots all line up to the New Worlds Professor Phd Virologist Epidemiologist Immunologist Dr Sir Gates Vaccines Nope none of these but he wants everyone to be Jabbed, as he said a few years ago it’s the best investment he’s ever made at 20 to 1. And if we do a really good job with Vaccines we can make people Healthier while De Populating the Planet Umm. Then we’ve got him in full collaboration with the FDA the CDC and of course all the Governments and Health officials and most people pushing the Vaccines have come through or involved with one of his backed Universities.Colleges.Institutions. in one way or another, how can he be a one man country in the w.h.o. I do small so it doesn’t get deleted by Fact Checkers oh Reuters Yeh of course he’s one of they’re backed companies, and of course Jane Halton the one closest to the Government works for Gates Foundation besides many other boards. Then if we can go and look at AstraZeneca well not really AstraZeneca anymore they changed their name over 6 months ago to Vaxzevria but the Deputy Head of Health for Medicines Australia Liz Chatwin who is also President of AstraZeneca Australia no Conflict of Interest there then and the Ex Treasurer of Australia Tim Costello setting up a Foundation for the Government which invested a Billion or two into you’ve guessed it Vaccines lets keep pushing the money Honey while Pfizer has now got full approval for its Jabs but it’s not called Pfizer now it’s called Comirnity. But they want us all to trust them even though they’ve been sued for Billions over the years for Malpractices and Billy boy has invested in them all especially the one called Moderna which is also allowed in Australia nicely set up with Dr Fauci and his NIA the same Dr Fauci that Kary Mullis the Noble Prize winner inventor of the PCR test who said they should never be used for these Viruses tests Period as they can pick up the slightest fragment of anything, the same Kary Mullis who challenged Dr Fauci to a debate on Science and the human body as he said he knew absolutely nothing about science and they had some kind of Agenda, unfortunately that debate never happened as Kary Mullis died a few months later of all things Pneumonia Yeh Right as a few months later after his death we’ve got a so called Pandemic. We’ll we’ve certainly got a Virus that’s killed unfortunately around 4 million people either from it or with it but we don’t get to know what underlying health conditions and illnesses they have and of course every single death is sad but considering we have 60 million people die every single year no one says a word about them as only Covid matters. A Pro Vaccine Poliomyelitis Survivor 😎👍🥋

Reply
CATE TAYLOR
8/29/2021 10:40:52 am

Alan to be a polio survivor as was my brother I am thinking age early 70's if you live in Aus? If so it was refreshing to read how fully informed you are.It does take time to garner all this information and like a jigsaw piece it all together with still many pieces missing.My brother would think these theories mad as he perceives me.Kudos to you.

Reply
Rachael Beer
9/1/2021 02:24:21 pm

I absolutely will not partake in any vaccine passports.. it is none of anyone's business what I choose to do regarding my health. I am not a threat to anyone if I choose not to receive a vaccine as it doesn't even make any difference whether I can catch it or transmit it. Even if I were to get the vaccine I would still be opposed to such a draconian overreach of government

Reply
Luke Kent
9/2/2021 06:58:10 pm

Vaccine passports are just a modern version of 'papers please' amd we know how badly that ended.
Australian citizens should not have their constitutional rights uprooted by irrational responses to covid.

A fully vaccinated person can spread covid and can die from covid.

The only reason for these passports are to increase government control over citizens!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Our articles and rebuttal pieces are written by our writers on our volunteer team

    Archives

    August 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020

    Categories

    All
    Covid
    Rebuttal
    Vaccine Education
    Vaccine Injury Stories

    RSS Feed

Home

Who We Are
Vision and Mission 
Our Objectives
Contact Us

Truth Day

Truth Day Questions
Research & Resources
Letters to Your MPs
Recommended Reading, Viewing & Tools

Connect

Newsletter Sign Up
Social Media
Join Our Team
​Calendar Of Events

News

Picture
© Copyright 2022 Vaccine Choice Australia                      Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • TRUTH DAY
  • Current MP Letters
  • Rebuttal and News
  • RESOURCES
  • CONNECT
  • Write to your MPs
  • Stand Up Australia